Monday, October 19, 2009

Prominence on political parties is regressive nationalism

In constitution making processes many ups and downs are imminent .But all the people from different political parties are found to be taking advantage of turmoil persisting in the country. The turbulent forces extant in the nation are ironically trying to be regressive rather than progressive as they are all limited to their selfish schema .The different proposals for division of nation into different states are imminent but most of the suggestions are likely to be based on the auspices of a particular party and they are likely to be contradictory with each other and finally the important issues for integration of nation will probably be overshadowed.

In a nation like Nepal, there must be a governing body which can by hook or by crook execute the practical governmental system passed in papers. Maoists seemed to be having passion for bringing drastic and fundamental changes at the beginning, seem to be fading away at present due to ineptness of governing a nation in the over- ground. Now, at present for the Maoists, ruling a nation has become like an imbroglio. Almost all of their programs are contradictory with the other parties’ programs. No sooner had they come to power they declared themselves to be panacea for all kinds of upheavals but it turned out to be impasse.
At this crucial moment of nation building process, who will be able to settle down all these messy, helter-skelter and topsy-turvy admixtures if Maoists can’t? Other political parties they have been experienced and testified. Camaraderie among all is a must to bring completeness in ruling a nation of fluidity. Solidarity of all the adroit human resources from these many political parties will surely spread fragrance to other anti-national forces. It ultimately inspires them to be compatriots, if they are found to be fighting against nationality even after such inspiring coalescence; government should suppress them by using national forces.

Present trends of demanding something for a specific community, at the outset, is initiated by the Maoists. They made people of various ethnic groups realize the grievances and aroused consciousness among those groups for raising the voice against exploitation. This the very right thing they did as it was and still it is, but the way they enticed those minority groups is going to reach the stages of peripetia, anagnorisis and catastrophe respectively. This is nothing other than the characteristic of momentary and regressive nationalism emerging out of unhealthy political game.
As we all have witnessed the condition of nation and the mushrooming underground outfits. If the demands were not fulfilled most of groups would go for violent means and hence result in disasters. Whenever and wherever the leaders are in maladroit stage they go on disparaging the other ‘anti leader’ ultimately leading the matter into conflagration. Responsible leaders are always found to be one sided and are in a condition to collide with the other. All the leaders of all political parties claim to be responsible for bringing changes and establishing well furnished governance in the country, but unfortunately, none is found implementing their commitments.

If these procedures of forming commissions are only for the purpose of formalities, why don’t the experts sit in a five star hotel and copy and paste the former reports of Raymajhi Commission and other? All impractical things can be made practical searching through impossible possibilities. Instead of lingering in criticizing ‘anti matter’ which is only hypothetical, it is rather wise for all the nation builders to get involved in constructive and creative works. I wonder why the leaders do not learn lessons from their past mistakes. Many commitments are expressed but of no trustfulness. We need common goal for all the nation builders to fulfill the aspirations of our great patriots. All the common goals, at present, are only the goals of particular political parties in variance. No national goal or policy persists in this nation so far which is very shameful. There must be solidarity among the political parties in terms of dealing with international communities but it has rarely been common. It is really unknown to the non-political citizens whether they are citizens of Nepal as they don’t have any place for expressing their opinions or grievances. The platforms are made available by the parties or organizations either influenced by political parties or groups with biasness about some particular issues. Agenda of political parties or organizations might be in favor of national integration but if they are raised by other parties or organizations such topics are always transgressed into anti national agenda for the only reason of being raised by other than the present ruling party. Is it progressive nationalism? An intellectual citizen can easily make out the implicit meaning. Many progressive issues of Maoist are transfigured into regressive due to some polluted elements present in core of their organization. Other political parties are known by their past developments and the system of their governance. All the parties are not different parties for the nation they are common strength of nation at least at this hour of fluidity. They all should be together hand in hand and go ahead with progressive national agenda forgetting their selfish motive of gaining something for a particular party. They must be able to sacrifice something for the sake of nation coming above the level of party politics at least during this constitution making process. Let all the pessimistic feeling of the public vanish with the inspiring work of coalescing all the leaders of various political parties.

No comments:

Post a Comment